Home World Iran 'dangerous' to peace, says GOP Rep. who backs Trump on U.S....

Iran ‘dangerous’ to peace, says GOP Rep. who backs Trump on U.S. military involvement

U.S. Rep. Mike Lawler, of New York's 17th District, marches in the 2025 Israel Day Parade, on New York's Fifth Avenue, Sunday, May 18.

U.S. Rep. Mike Lawler, of New York’s 17th District, marches in the 2025 Israel Day Parade, on New York’s Fifth Avenue, Sunday, May 18. Richard Drew/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Richard Drew/AP

House Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., agrees with President Trump that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon and would support a move by the president to strike and fully eliminate Tehran’s nuclear program.

“A nuclear Iran will seek to eradicate Israel and all but ensure WWIII,” Lawler said in a post on X. “We cannot allow that to happen. We must stand with Israel.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stressed the threat posed by a nuclear weapon-armed Iran as justification for the strikes carried out over the past few days, though Iran’s capabilities are up for debate.

Sponsor Message

While the administration is weighing its options about whether to actively join Israel in its conflict against Iran, Lawler told Morning Edition he supports involvement, “if that is what is required to finish the job.”

Lawler is not alone in his thinking, though some members of his party and many Democrats are calling for restraint.

This includes some of the president’s most staunch supporters who have warned against such a move.

Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon are among leading conservative voices who want the U.S. to stay out.

“My interest is really simple. I don’t want the United States enmeshed in another Middle Eastern war that doesn’t serve our interests,” Carlson said on Bannon’s War Room podcast.

Trump yesterday convened a meeting with his national security team. Though no decision has been made, before the meeting, Trump said in a post on Truth Social that his administration’s “patience is wearing thin.”

In a conversation with Morning Edition, Lawler spoke to NPR’s Steve Inskeep about what steps the U.S. should take with regards to Iran.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.


Interview highlights

Steve Inskeep: When President [Trump] says we have control of the skies, are we – meaning the United States – already involved in this war?

Sponsor Message

Rep. Mike Lawler: I think realistically, the United States has supplied Israel with a lot of military equipment and ammunition. In addition, there’s great intelligence cooperation between our two nations. And I can certainly say that over the course of the last few months, there’s been communication and cooperation as Israel made the decision to take a preemptive strike against a nuclear Iran and its continued threats to eradicate the state of Israel.

Inskeep: Just a few days ago, the United States was saying, we’re not part of this. Now the president is saying literally, “We are in it.” Are we in it?

Lawler: Again, I think there has always been great cooperation and coordination, communication. You have to remember, there’s 40,000 American troops in the Middle East. We have bases within proximity to Iran. Obviously, we want to make sure that Iran does not strike at our military personnel. In addition, I think it’s often forgotten there’s 700,000-plus Americans living in Israel either part time or full time. So that’s the size almost of a congressional district.

Inskeep: Regardless of the involvement the United States may have had up to now, there’s the discussion of the United States specifically deploying a bunker-busting bomb, a giant bomb that could potentially, we’re told, damage or destroy an Iranian nuclear facility at Fordo beneath a mountain. Should the United States do that?

Lawler: In my opinion, yes. I think the reality of the situation is that a nuclear Iran is dangerous for peace and stability, not just in the Middle East, but throughout the world. The relationship they have had with China, with Russia, the coordinated effort to undermine and destabilise the free world. We have to take all of this into account. And Iran obviously is teetering on the brink. You can see it. You can see the potential for an uprising within, by the Iranian people, not by the U.S. or Israel, but by the Iranian people. And a nuclear Iran is the only thing standing in the way from that happening. And so from my vantage point, when you look at the totality of the situation, Israel has taken great steps to weaken Iran’s air defenses over the past year. They’ve taken great steps to eliminate the nuclear program. But we all knew that they would not fully be able to do it without U.S. engagement and involvement. And if that is what is required to finish the job, I fully support it.

Inskeep: I just want to underline some of the risks here. We don’t know how a war would turn out. That’s one of the realities of war. The war in Iraq did not turn out the way that a lot of people expected when the United States went after weapons of mass destruction there. There’s also the question of political support at home, and there’s the matter of the law. Traditionally, if the United States was to attack another country, it would call for a declaration of war by Congress. The Constitution literally calls for that, even though the expectation is blurred in recent decades. Do you believe that any action is required by Congress before the president would have permission to attack Iran?

Sponsor Message

Lawler: In recent years, administrations, both Republican and Democrat, have taken targeted strikes and done so without coming to Congress for approval. The reality of this situation is far different than Iraq of two decades ago in terms of how this is being conducted. War has changed significantly. We see it every day. We see it with what Ukraine just did in Russia. We see it obviously how Israel has conducted this war.

Inskeep: So should Congress act then?

Lawler: Any further steps that would require U.S. troops on the ground. Certainly, that’s something that would have to come to Congress. But as far as working with Israel to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, I support that. And I support the president’s actions that he may take.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Impostor uses AI to impersonate Rubio and contact foreign and U.S. officials

Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a signing ceremony for a peace agreement between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo at the State Department, June 27, 2025, in Washington. Mark Schiefelbein/AP hide caption toggle caption Mark Schiefelbein/AP WASHINGTON — The State Department is warning U.S. diplomats of attempts to impersonate Secretary of State

What a Long Lost Typewriter Says About Chinese Culture

Enlarge this image The MingKwai typewriter's keys enable the typist to find and retrieve Chinese characters. Elisabeth von Boch/Stanford hide caption toggle caption Elisabeth von Boch/Stanford The MingKwai typewriter's keys enable the typist to find and retrieve Chinese characters. Elisabeth von Boch/Stanford A typewriter recently discovered in a basement in upstate New York holds important

Haiti’s iconic Hotel Oloffson, long a cultural beacon, destroyed by gang violence

Main entry to the Hotel Oloffson, built as a private residence by Simon Sam in about 1886. American Marines leased it and turned it into a military hospital in the early 20th century. In 1936 Walter Oloffson converted it to a hotel. In the 1950s through 1970s it was a Hollywood jetset destination. Don Bartletti/Los

With Indus Waters Treaty in the balance, Pakistan braces for more water woes

The Chenab, one of the three rivers allocated to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty, seen from the riverbank in early June in Punjab province, Pakistan. Betsy Joles for NPR hide caption toggle caption Betsy Joles for NPR ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — High in the Himalayas, the Indus River flows over the Tibetan Plateau before branching

The war in Gaza divided a historic Brooklyn co-op. Here’s what happened next

The Park Slope Food Co-op, founded in 1973, is a Brooklyn institution. In recent months the cooperative grocery store has been torn apart by allegations of antisemitism and discrimination, as the collective debates a boycott of Israeli goods. Vanessa Romo/NPR hide caption toggle caption Vanessa Romo/NPR NEW YORK – The Park Slope Food Co-op is